This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
The section Terrigno Law Suit of the article contains the following:
“
In February 2015, Mike Terrigno represented the family in the development zoning application at the Calgary Planning Commission meeting. Calgary Planning Commission's recommendation was that the re-zoning application should be refused. Their application for the development of a 10-storey condo and commercial tower on the restaurant site provoked intense opposition from community planners. The meeting was called to an abrupt halt when "Terrigno's actions in the hallway prompted police complaints from community planners and a city hall security investigation following an exchange with a city employee."
”
I don't see what this has to do with Farrell. There are <ref>s to two newpaper articles in the Calgary Herald, but neither mentions Farrell. My inclination is to delete the part of the section quoted above. What do others think? 165.140.231.19 (talk) 16:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that whole section is a mess. I think the text you quote above is background for the lawsuit, but I agree it's unnecessary detail. I'm also concerned about the Stampede section after that; is that issue also included in the 2017 lawsuit? Why is it mentioned in this section? And the last sentence, The case and two appeals were all dismissed. Was there only the one case? Or did the Terrignos sue Farrell multiple times? What decisions were appealed? Who appealed? I agree with the proposed deletion, but I'd suggest reading the cited sources and rewriting the rest of that section to be clearer.Commenting because of post at WP:BLPN. Schazjmd(talk)15:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Morbidthoughts has done the work. Here are the primary sources for the case and two appeals in case anybody has the skill to read them:
