Talk:Drug classification: making a hash of it?

Is this notable enough for its own article? Did it get alot of press in the UK, in which case some popular feedback from the press would be important if not essential to show this. Otherwise should be merged into drug policy as an interesting episode I guess. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I want science, not prejudices.

I think it is completely ridiculous that our drug policy isn't based on science. This is comparable to the theory of evolution being replaced by creationism. Of course the theory of evolution should be taught to kids, not creationism, and of course our drug policy should be based on science, not prejudices.--158.39.240.107 (talk) 20:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't follow - what are you referring to? Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen this BBC documentary about the report? http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6108672696241807159 --Zanthius (talk) 09:50, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rewriting

There could be ten times the content in this article than there presently is. Also, per Casliber above, media reactions and follow-ups are needed: this report was written by an influential body, so did the government simply ignore it? I'm rewriting (well, writing, as there was barely anything there) the entire article; anybody is welcome to join. AGK [•] 14:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Update needed

This article needs an update. Has it been superseded? Has it been acted upon? Did anything change? Verne Equinox (talk) 01:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]