Talk:Druanne White

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 July 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

It is requested that an image or photograph of Druanne White be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Ms. White seems only notable for her involvement in the Stephanie Carter case, which is barely notable in itself except that the tragic circumstances surrounding that case have engendered something of a local charity movement. The Order of the Palmetto award cannot really be considered as conferring notability as the list of recipients is 114 pages long. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been improved. She has received national attention for being one of the foremost experts on capital punishment. She testified on the subject in front of the Senate Judiciary committee. The Marchbanks trial received national attention and will be the subject of a book. Further, she has instructed prosecutors from all over the United States. Divide that 114 by the number of years, and it is impressive considering approximately three a year are awarded. Lawstudent1984 (talk) 15:09, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The national attention for being a foremost expert on the subject of capital punishment is not borne out by the references. Her position as a solicitor alone would qualify her to testify to the Senate committee; that does not make her a "foremost expert". The references bear out that the Marchbanks trial received local coverage, not national coverage, and the coverage mentioned White only trivially. The reference to the National College of District Attorneys does not verify that she ever taught at that institution. Nor would such a position inherently confer notability (see WP:ACADEMIC). Finally, I believe Lawstudent1984 (talk · contribs) misunderstood my remark about the Order of the Palmetto. There have not been 114 recipients; there are 114 pages of recipients, with 31 names per page, which works out to over 3500 recipients since 1971. And the list even admits of being incomplete. So, I believe we have to conclude that this honor is not so rare or exclusive. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:44, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since Lawstudent1984 (talk · contribs) disagrees with my assessment of Ms White's notability, I will remove the proposed deletion and instead move this to a Wikipedia:Articles for deletion to gain more consensus. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:46, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do continue to disagree. The United States Senate would not call White as an expert witness if she was not an expert. Further, if the Order of the Palmetto itself warrants a Wikipedia article, so should its recipients. I fear that the disagreement with the notoriety in this situation is misplaced. Perhaps there would be no disagreement if White was an obscure author rather than a heralded advocate. Delete if you must, but understand that it would be Wikipedia's loss to do so. Lawstudent1984 (talk) 22:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Druanne White. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]