Talk:Drip gas
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 6 March 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
2008-03-5 Automated pywikipediabot message
[edit]This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
--CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 12:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
While doing some research on Coleman fuel, I found this page and added a bunch of information. But later I found the natural gas condensate page, with which it should probably be merged as they are two names for the same thing. It's a puzzle to me why there is so little published on something that's so much a part of the 20th century. Altaphon (talk) 16:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- (Years later) Agree, and I've put up a note at the condensate page to spur discussion. Let's see if anyone comments in the next few days. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC)