Talk:Dream (American group)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article Separation

I see a lumping together here, this article seems to say that the Dream revival and the Lady Phoenix band are the same thing. They are separate. Lady Phoenix is the old members, the new Dream is a completely separate entity with Jordan McCoy and Danielle Keaton.

Neither is accurate. There is no "new dream" and Lady Phoenix was comprised of three original members of Dream. lady Phoenix never claimed to be Dream, just the former members of Dream. That is fact and undisputed. The claim of Jordan McCoy et al. is completely fraudulent and without merit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.112.95.114 (talk) 04:37, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa Schuman is a actress from Dream, she has done several movies and still acts. Her page should not be merged with the other Dream members. Lady Phoenix is a new group with the 3 original members of Dream, all who also do there own things. There pages should not be merged and Lady Phoenix is signed and coming back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frederick10027 (talk • contribs) 07:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dream (American group). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150626162508/http://www.hollywood.com/general/2001-teen-choice-awards-57162725/ to http://www.hollywood.com/general/2001-teen-choice-awards-57162725/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dream (American group). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://music.yahoo.com/read/news/12038248
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060509043839/http://www.mtv.com/bands/g/girl_groups/news_feature_092002/ to http://www.mtv.com/bands/g/girl_groups/news_feature_092002/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071105070249/http://www.mtv.com/bands/archive/d/dream01/ to http://www.mtv.com/bands/archive/d/dream01/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Main photo

I have tried to change the page's main photo to an edited photo that crops the group together ([1]). User:Tm does not believe it to be a suitable representation, having reverted it to the original ([2]) multiple times. The original is spaced in a way that does not show any of the members clearly when viewed within the article on any device. As of writing, the user has changed it to an image that only shows two of the group's members ([3]). To avoid an edit war, I was looking for some feedback and discussion. Thank you. Breaktheicees (talk) 08:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(summoned by the bot) I prefer the original. In my view, we should avoid photos that have been substantively altered like the cropped one, which has removed the space between the group's members, altered the background, and apparently added part of the leftmost member's dress which is not seen in the original photo. The other image showing only two of the group's members is fine but might be better later in the article rather than the infobox. None of these photos are ideal, and I hope we can find a better one. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 09:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Thank you for commenting. How would you feel about an edit styled similarly to the one used on the Sugababes page? Breaktheicees (talk) 17:20, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That seems like a good idea to me. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Thanks again for the feedback. Breaktheicees (talk) 20:05, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(summoned by the bot) I dont like the cropped picture for reasons explained above.--Wuerzele (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]