Talk:Drashti Dhami

Untitled

Dhrasti Dhami is from Gujarati family not Punjabi

In one of her interviews she has stated that she belongs to a Punjabi family. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mechantefille (talk • contribs) 18:53, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

She is an Indian girl. Fatima talk 13:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes I think so but it seems as if she is a Punjabi. Brandy Mogorosi (talk) 16:09, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Brand ambassador of Canvironment Week 2011.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Brand ambassador of Canvironment Week 2011.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 18 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Drashti in geet hui sabse parayi.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Drashti in geet hui sabse parayi.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 18 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Geet11.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Geet11.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Geet11.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:DD sangeet.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:DD sangeet.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:DD sangeet.JPG) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Bollywoodlife.com and Starsunfolded

In this edit I removed the subject's height content because it was based on BollywoodLife.com and Starsunfolded. Firstly, Starsunfolded has nothing anywhere on its site to indicate that there's any editorial oversight whatsoever, let alone that any human being is even running the frickin' site. It looks like every other cookie-cutter content scraper, and for all we know it scraped the subject's biographical details from earlier versions of Wikipedia. No editorial oversight = not a reliable source. To Zafar24's point here, "BollywoodLife.com is reliable source. Its belongs to Essel Group." You're free to open a discussion in some intuitive place to seek consensus for acknowledging BollywoodLife.com as a reliable source, but the threshold for inclusion is editorial oversight. If we don't know who the editors are, then it's a hard-sell to claim that it's reliable simply because it's owned by someone who runs other reliable ventures. This doesn't exactly look like a well thought-out article written by a known journalist. The site describes itself as a portal, and "portals" are typically very poor sources of information, as they often just blindly republish content found elsewhere, and scrape (harvest) data from other websites. If having the subject's height in this article is so important, you should go through WP:RSN. Good luck. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Dear @Cyphoidbomb:, just because Bollywood.com is a portal site you cannot say that it is not reliable. But the portal site belongs to notable venture. Bollywood.com has also verified facebook and twitter page. About infobox wikipedia thing, yes I agree because author was missing but we can write the matrial which belongs to the author of bollywoodlife.com. Please see Shraddha Kapoor page in reference number 84 and 85, contributors also gave reference of Bollywoodlife.com Zafar24Talk 17:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: Bombay Times mentioned BollywoodLife.com in this article here.

The Times of India and Yahoo Lifestyle mentioned BollywoodLife.com in this article here and here.Zafar24Talk 22:43, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

I can probably dig up scores of instances where otherwise reliable sources republish stuff found at any number of other sites including blogs like Onlookersmedia. That doesn't mean these portals and blogs are doing any actual research or that Wikipedia should automatically consider them reliable. "We have nothing else to publish today, so let's publish this" probably happens more often than you think. A much stronger metric for reliability is if you know who is behind the site and who is actively providing editorial oversight. If you know nothing about them, then you can't make any assumptions about their reliability. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:25, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Image edit war

@GoodName and LX: Re: the edit war that's currently going on about the Infobox image, this image is an obvious Photoshop, and appears to be a combination of Dhami's face superimposed on Hariprriya's body. We don't use manipulated composites in Infoboxes, so this image is insufficient for inclusion. There are also copyright concerns, as it's debatable whether the uploader at Flickr had legitimate rights to manipulate the image and pass off the image as their own work. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:26, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting GoodName's edits again. For the record, my two reverts were not edit warring, as they are covered by points 4, 5 and 7 under Wikipedia:Edit warring#Exemptions. GoodName quite obviously thinks we're all idiots or don't have eyes to see with. It would be helpful if they accepted that they simply aren't good enough of a liar to be able to pull off this copyvio hoax. Which isn't really anything to aspire to anyway. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:34, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Drashti Dhami

Why did you remove the award nominations for the show Pardes Mein Hai Mera Dil? She was nominated for that 3 categories in 2017 Star Parivaar awards. Please add it Tejaswi Nair (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

@Tejaswi Nair: The Star Parivaar Awards are a self-aggrandising in-house award, where the Star network praises people on its own network. It is the television equivalent of winning the "Most Handsome Award" from your own mother. Per a discussion at WT:ICTF, we no longer include this fluff. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:07, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Drashti Dhami at the Launch of TV serial Madhubala.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:13, 30 June 2021 (UTC)