Talk:Drøbak-Frogn IL

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Football: Norway Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Norwegian football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Their name

Their name is hard to understand. Their own by-laws use three names (!): "Drøbak/Frogn", "Drøbak-Frogn" and "Drøbak Frogn". The two former are most common. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 06:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Drøbak/Frogn IL → Drøbak-Frogn IL – See official site (http://dfi.no/fotball/) – Pladask (talk) 20:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 03:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment MOS:SLASH suggests not using slashes. It also makes a page a subpage of another, which is bad. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 05:23, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - existing title is technically OK per WP:NC-SLASH, but website supports unslashed name.--ukexpat (talk) 14:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Given that the club itself uses the name hyphenated instead of the slash used in the present title this should be an uncontroversial move. __meco (talk) 16:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - We have some Norwegian football clubs where it is unclear if we should use a slash or a dash in the article title. When the club itself use a dash, this article should be moved. Mentoz86 (talk) 15:56, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Seems to be what the club is actually called. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:26, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Drøbak-Frogn IL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001093940/http://idrett.speaker.no/Organisation.asp?WCI=wiKlubbKassaNews&WCU=24444 to http://idrett.speaker.no/Organisation.asp?WCI=wiKlubbKassaNews&WCU=24444

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:40, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]