Talk:Douz skirmish
Appearance
Article
[edit]Is this for specific article?--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 21:50, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
It is not a battle anyway, more like a small incursion and a clash. --ChronicalUsual (talk) 22:02, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- One small skirmish, nothing else. And its Tunisian internal problem, not part of armed action by any side of Libyan civil war. It should be deleted since we already have it in timeline section. --EllsworthSK (talk) 08:35, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with deleting this article.--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 13:33, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think a few summary sentences should be merged to the Douz article and this page redirected there. The information is worth retaining, but I don't find it article-worthy. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 01:13, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- Done, this isn´t articleworthy. Section in Douz article is perfectly capable of covering this event. --EllsworthSK (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- I also support the merger. EkoGraf (talk) 16:39, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- Strong Support --Ave César Filito (talk) 16:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have rolled the article back and protected it from new/unregistered users for a month; if it starts back up let me know and I'll take care of it. Parsecboy (talk) 10:54, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Strong Support --Ave César Filito (talk) 16:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- I also support the merger. EkoGraf (talk) 16:39, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- Done, this isn´t articleworthy. Section in Douz article is perfectly capable of covering this event. --EllsworthSK (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think a few summary sentences should be merged to the Douz article and this page redirected there. The information is worth retaining, but I don't find it article-worthy. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 01:13, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with deleting this article.--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 13:33, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Updated
[edit]Okay; i've added loads of new information & references. I think it's article worthy now 81.98.167.142 (talk) 14:52, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- No, it isn´t. It´s one small skirmish, that is not article-worthy and Douz article covers that just enough. --EllsworthSK (talk) 20:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC)