This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
The page currently claims: "Other sources say he was dismissed for the ill treatment of prisoners and that his name was the source of the slang expression "to duff up" someone." Two print sources are cited that are not easily check-able, but it seems very dubious to me. Checking British newspapers, variations on this phrase did not start appearing until the early-1960s, almost thirty years after the events claimed to inspire it. It seem incredibly unlikely that such an obscure person as Duff could have entered the colloquial English language decades after the fact. According to my Concise Oxford Dictionary, the phrase is thought to derive from the noun "duffer" as an "inefficient, useless of stupid person," i.e. to beat someone senseless/stupid. Nick Cooper (talk) 12:09, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]