This article was nominated for deletion on September 13, 2007. The result of the discussion was delete.
A fact from Douga appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 August 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Mandinkadouga, the "dance of the vulture" described in 20th-century African literature, may go back to Sundiata, and reach across to American Gullah culture, buck dance, and the minstrel show?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Adequate sourcing comment: Yes, but some of the verification is not obvious because of alternative spellings between the references and the wikipedia article text (e.g. Malinke vs Mandinka, Sunjata vs Sundiata Keita). For example, searching for "Sundiata Keita" in ref #3 turns up zero results, but I happened to notice the word Sunjata and it turns out to redirect to Sundiata Keita. Not sure what an elegant solution is for this but it's worth mulling over. Further, some of the references cover large page ranges (e.g. ref #1, 2) or highly diverging page ranges (e.g. ref #3, 7) which makes it more difficult to verify the very specific claims in the article which generally only refer to a particular line or two in the reference. WP:IBID would help here.
Axem Titanium, thank you for the review. About the references--ref 1 is a journal article, and we typically cite the page numbers for the entire journal. I have added the page numbers for the claims. I can't do anything about the page numbers for the books, and it's not that many pages: all the styles in which I've published discourage "ibid". As for the names/spellings, you'd be surprised, maybe, how many spellings there are for Sundiata, for instance. In my writing I try to stick to the Wikipedia convention, but that's just one convention, and the different spellings can't even agree on the accent aigu in various words. I have "Malinke" in the article, but that's in a direct quote, and the Azodo article uses "Son-Jara" instead of Sundiata. There's really nothing I can do about that. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 21:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The edits help a lot with finding the referenced statement. The various spellings issue is a bit outside of scope for a DYK review but I thought I'd bring it up anyway. Looks good to go! Axem Titanium (talk) 21:16, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]