Jump to content

Talk:Double Concerto (Brahms)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article says: "...and which can be analyzed using the triadic transformations proposed by Bernhard Riemann." The person to be credited is the Musicologist Hugo Riemann, not the mathematician Bernhard Riemann. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.185.155.153 (talk) 21:28, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That this piece can be, or has been, anlaysed from a "Riemannian perspective" tells us absolutely nothing about it, unless the results of the analysis are also discussed. At present we are told only of "progressions that divide the octave into three parts", which is not illuminating. If Cohn's work is worth including in this article at all, then it is worth describing its application to the Double Concerto in more detail. JBritnell (talk) 07:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


"Frei aber einsam" - F-A-E permutation in double concerto?

I doubt that numerologist interpretation. The cello's theme begins A-G-E, the violin replies with F-E-A. Could somebody clear that up please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.47.246.172 (talk) 11:11, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Double Concerto (Brahms). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]