Talk:Dorsal veins of the penis

Anatomy: Gross Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

orangelioncat (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. ((Optional) I am a colleague of the person originally creating the images; their rights were released under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 license. As the work was recently published in the Encyclopedia of Reproduction -see reference-, we felt we could contribute to Wikipedia as well. No financial conflict of interest exists, and the goal is to disseminate the verifiable knowledge, Dorsal veins of the penis.)

Merge proposal

Superficial dorsal vein of the penis and Deep dorsal vein of the penis are short articles with a good amount of overlapping imagery and information. I don't think there is a lot more that can be said about them individually, so I propose merging them into a single article covering both. bd2412 T 02:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge. To some audiences, the importance between these veins is very important, even if the articles about them are so far only minimally developed. --Arcadian (talk) 04:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How much more developed can they possibly get? We can at least merge until there is enough material on each to sustain an article of respectable size. bd2412 T 04:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the differences can be discussed in the article and when the time comes individual articles can be developed, but this one is a tiny stub, it may help to join it with a larger article.

Kateweb (talk) 05:12, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images inappropriate

Since this is an article on human anatomy, shouldn't the images we use be of penises that have not been modified by surgery?

Not if the circumcision makes the veins easier to see. (P.S. Use ~~~~ to sign your posts on talk pages.) Jwoodward48wiki (talk) 22:00, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

2011 08 08 PVS Fig5 Clinic Brochure.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

2011 08 08 PVS Fig5 Clinic Brochure.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]