Talk:Dorothy Bain

Dorothy Bain was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 12, 2024). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Untitled

I agree prosecuting one notable case does not make you notable. However this is a very senior post, although I recognise the article could be clarified on this point. Please give people time to improve newly created articles. PatGallacher (talk) 23:03, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Dorothy Bain QC and Ruth Charteris with Nicola Sturgeon.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dorothy Bain/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Goodreg3 (talk · contribs) 23:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 19:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Earwig finds some overlap here. I think this is just about OK; most of it is quotes, and the main sentence other than quotes is quite hard to rephrase. Checking further down the Earwig list finds only quotes.

Sources:

The Daily Express is considered unreliable per WP:RS/PS.
Twitter is generally an unreliable source; I see you have another sources for Bain being sworn in as Lord Advocate -- do we really need the Twitter source?
You cite a blog at Transform; it's an institutional blog, so is probably as reliable as the site itself, but it would be better to find another source if possible since this is about a ministerial statement and surely that was reported elsewhere.
The first paragraph of "Calls for reform" is unsourced.

Spotchecks (footnote numbers refer to this version.

FN 20 cites "On 10 November, she was appointed to the Privy Council earning the title 'The Right Honourable'." This is a bit nitpicky, but the source doesn't actually say that being in the privy council earns one the title. I'm not inclined to regard this as a verification failure, but can you find anotheor source that makes that clear?
FN 28 cites "The case was ultimately unsuccessful for the Lord Advocate and the Scottish Government, with the Supreme Court ruling in favour that the Scottish Parliament does not have the legal ability to constitute for a second independence referendum "without the UK Government's permission"." Verified. I think you can cut "in favour", which looks like editing debris, and I'd suggest changing "constitute for" to "call" as simpler.
FN 50 cites "In May 2024, Bain, as Lord Advocate, stripped the Post Office of its status as a reporting agency. Instead, the Post Office would have to report all allegations of crime within the organisation to Police Scotland. In a statement, Bain said "because of its fundamental and sustained failures in connection with Horizon cases in Scotland, I’ve decided that Post Office Limited is not fit to be a specialist reporting agency". She further confirmed that the Post Office in Scotland "is therefore no longer able to investigate and report criminal allegations directly to the Crown and it should now instead report any allegations of criminality to Police Scotland for them to investigate"." Verified.
FN 42 cites "On 22 July 2022, Bain published the legal argument for a second referendum." Verified.
FN 23 cites "Bain has promised to act independently and has stated she will assist the First Minister over a review of the functions of Lord Advocate." Verified.

There are seven images of Bain; do we really need all seven? I haven't reviewed the images for copyright yet; let me know if you think any can be cut before I do so. Multiple images is fine but a couple of these seem unnecessary. I'll wait till the sources comments above are addressed before going ahead with a review of the body of the article. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 20:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Goodreg3, are you planning to work on this? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No response, so I am failing this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]