Talk:Dornier Do 31

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dornier Do 31 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

And the Purpose of the Stabby Nose?

To skewer enemy troops trying to prevent it from landing by standing in front of it?

Seriously, there has to be a story there.

*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 21:59, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd wager it was an instrumentation probe for the trials a/c. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 22:19, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dornier Do 31. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718231525/http://www.dorniermuseum.de/fileadmin/pdf/deutsch/DOR_090415_DO31.pdf to http://www.dorniermuseum.de/fileadmin/pdf/deutsch/DOR_090415_DO31.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Were the DO-960s actually on board?

From the reference: "Dornier started the business of building analog computers when they got into VTOL design (namely the already mentioned DO-31) - the mathematical problems posed by these aircraft made the development of advanced computer systems necessary. Since no digital processor then (and maybe even today) was able to solve all of the differential equations necessary to describe the airplane in detail, Dornier started building analog computers." [1]

This seems ambiguous to me, were the computers used during takeoff to make adjustments based on real-time calculations, or only in the design phase? From the source I assumed the latter, but the article states the former. I haven't been able to find another source that talks about this, so for the time being I'm adding an "additional citation needed".

Radeklew (talk) 22:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They were used long beforehand, in the design process, a Do-960 was a full-height rack across two cabinets. These were lab equipment, not flight gear. They were an analogue computer, controlled by a small minicomputer, a Data General NOVA, later an IBM-PC. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:15, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I figured, but I didn't know enough about VTOLs to confidently make the edit. I agree that this is the more reasonable interpretation, so I have edited the article. Radeklew (talk) 03:34, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Likely incorrect weight figure

Right now the stated empty weight in the Specifications section (49500 kg) is more than the stated thrust of the aircraft (298 kN -> 30400 kgf after adding up all the engines), which would make this aircraft unable to take off vertically in any conditions. I do not have access to either of the two main sources cited in the Specifications section, so I cannot check if this is a misreading of the sources, however the recent Youtube video by Military Aviation History listed in the "External Links" section gives the following weight figures (at 1:28 in the video): MTOW 21000 kg for vertical takeoff and MTOW 27500 kg for conventional takeoff, the video cites primary sources in the video description. TheDestroyer111 (talk) 19:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, Imperial and metric measurements were transposed in this April 2019 edit. I have corrected those figures and others that do not agree with the paper source in my hand (Observer's book of aircraft - 1968). Good spot. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 19:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]