Talk:Donations of Alexandria

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Egypt

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

unredirecting from Cleopatra VII

The original article with regards to the Donations of Alexandria, was simply a redirection to Cleopatra VII. That didn't make the content of exactly what the Donations were very clear. I believe that the Donations are a historical fact which deserve their own article. Therefore I've unredirected it and written an article about it. I've based myself on the information regarding the Donations found in various articles, like Marc Antony,... -- fdewaele, 21 January 2008, 13:20 (CET).

Historical Implication

Historian WW Tarn, in an essay entitled "Alexander Helios and the Golden Age" (Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 22, Part 2 [1932] pp 135-160), analyzes the religious "propangda" surrounding the Donations of Alexandria. Within the article he discusses the influences of symbol and prophecy surrounding the event. W.W. Tarn does direct focus on Alexander Helios as the "Christ"-type. However K.W. Meiklejohn (Alexander Helios and Caesarion) has already demonstrated the unquestioned position of Caesar(ion), King of Kings, Son of God. I will confront the conclusion that both Tarn and Meiklejohn avoided --Caesar(ion) was the TRUE CHRIST! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.235.226.214 (talk) 19:02, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction

The article says that Cleopatra, Caesarion's mother, was declared Queen of Libya, but goes on to say that his twin siste Cleopatra was also declared Queen of Libya. Some confusion seems to have crept in. --146.90.47.35 (talk) 20:24, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Libya was nominally dependend on Egypt, giving Cleopatra the real control. She was to be senior queen, Queen of Kingq, whereas her daughter was junior queen -- fdewaele, 23 July 2016, 22:30.

inaccurate map

The map does not reflect the "donations" of territory which was not ruled by Rome. i.e. Parthia and Media. 192.64.2.246 (talk) 15:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]