Talk:Don't Let Me Down (Leona Lewis song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DivaKnockouts (talk · contribs) 00:31, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Review

Background and development

• The internet leak subsection is outdated. Were there any other developments following? The section makes it seem like the investigation is still under procedure. Did they catch the hackers? If not then, isn't that worth noting?

  I don't think so.  — AARON • ^TALK 12:34, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

  That doesn't answer the above. — DivaKnockouts 18:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

  I don't think it's outdated.  — AARON • ^TALK 18:29, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

  The most recent reference in the subsection is from 2009. I suggest a sentence be added explaining that the hackers were never caught or something similar closing the discussion. As of right now it just seems open and weird. — DivaKnockouts 18:39, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

  We don't know if they were caught.  — AARON • ^TALK 20:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

• Fair enough. Passed. — DivaKnockouts 20:35, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Recording and production

• The track was recording by Paul Folley at Henson Studios and was mixed by Jean-Marie Harvat at East West Studios, both of which are located in Los Angeles, California. → The track was recorded by Paul Folley at Henson Studios and was mixed by Jean-Marie Harvat at East West Studios, both of which are located in Los Angeles, California.

  Y  — AARON • ^TALK

Composition and critical reception

• "Don't Let Me Down" appears as the eleventh track on the standard edition of Echo, and lasts for a duration of 4:36. -- You cite the Deluxe Edition of the album not the standard edition, thus FN11 does not support the sentence it references.

  The UK is the standard edition.  — AARON • ^TALK

  Got it. — DivaKnockouts 18:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

• Redundant use of "The song"

  What's redundant about it? It's fine.  — AARON • ^TALK

  You use "The song" too much. Consider rewording. — DivaKnockouts 18:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

  Y  — AARON • ^TALK 18:29, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

• Nick Levine for Digital Spy was brief in his review of the song, simply calling it "lovely". -- Levine isn't reviewing just the song, however this is what you convey. Consider rewording.

  Y  — AARON • ^TALK

Live performances

• Redundant use of "called"; how about the second time you use "called" change it to "entitled" or something similar?

  Y  — AARON • ^TALK

Tracklisting

• Again, you cite the deluxe edition of the album instead of the standard edition

  UK is the standard format. Doesn't matter if the CD itself is standard or deluxe, still appears in the same order.  — AARON • ^TALK

References

• Everything looks fine here. Good job.

• Putting article  On hold until issues have been addressed. — DivaKnockouts 01:05, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Final Result

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

— DivaKnockouts 20:35, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.  — AARON • ^TALK 20:36, 17 March 2013 (UTC)