Talk:Dominus vobiscum

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

removing promotional 'other uses'

I removed the newly added 'other uses' section which listed a catholic retreat, as it was promotional and only primarly sourced. Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominus Vobiscum: Marriage and Family Retreat Centre. Eclipsed (talk) (code of ethics) 12:50, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The original editor has put back the section, without discussion. I have added this to the delete discussion mentioned above. Eclipsed (talk) (code of ethics) 14:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When I put back the 'other uses' section, I added a secondary source (a prominent Montreal newspaper). I'm sorry I did so without discussion. Is the source adequate? Also, the 'other uses' section is not new.Steamlunch (talk) 14:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps best to first discuss the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominus Vobiscum: Marriage and Family Retreat Centre, as that is about same subject, and about the validity of the sources therein. Eclipsed (talk) (code of ethics) 14:40, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you are correct, the 'other uses' section was not new. My apologies. However the notability of inclusion is still up for discussion. Eclipsed (talk) (code of ethics) 14:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Dominus vobiscum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:12, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]