Talk:Dominion (Stargate SG-1)
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Ancient action
[edit]From the notes section (removed):
It's unclear why the ancients didn't act against Adria when she ascended, as the reason given for them not acting against the Ori was that the Ori stay in their galaxy.
I removed this because we technically don't know that they haven't taken some form of action. Opinions? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mattbuck (talk • contribs) 19:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC).
- It's pure speculation (that they didn't act, and that Adria stayed in that galaxy after she acended), and should stay gone. --Maelwys 20:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Aside from the fact that this shouldnt be mentioned in the episode synopsis because the whole thing is OR. She didnt get stopped because she was born a human, she may have been super-intelligent and advanced, but she was not an Ori that descended, she was born a human, which makers her no different to her followers or the priors, Ancients wont interfere with her acension because of free will, just like they didnt interfer with Anubis' until after he started making an ass of himself on the higher plane - Count23 04:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Blooper
[edit]Also from the notes section (Corrected spelling mistake):
"Blooper: Vala's watch initially reads 2:16 when she is being lifted off the floor by Adria. After Adria ascends, her watch reads 2:56"
Maybe it's because ascending takes some time? It is really a matter of personal opinion, but I do not think it should be considered as a blooper. It might be an indication to how time passes during the plot of the episode. However, I admit that I have not seen this episode yet, therefore if Vala is lifted up and Adria ascends immediately after, or after just a couple of minutes during which we see other characters perform little action (Some action that can take only minutes to perform), then truly 40 minutes cannot have passed during this short amount of time. We can therefore conclude it is a blooper. I am just asking for confirmation here...
Darkdrium (Not registered)
Fair use rationale for Image:Sg1-s10e19-0.jpg
[edit]
Image:Sg1-s10e19-0.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
#c-BetacommandBot-2007-09-27T01:02:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_Image:Sg1-s10e19-0.jpg){kind=link}