Jump to content

Talk:Dominican amber

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Finished Article

[edit]

I have added as many sources as I could find, as well as pictures and the likes. I think the article is ready for peer review. Let the struggle begin! --The Singularity (talk) 16:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger With Caribbean Amber

[edit]

It's been suggested to merge the Caribbean amber article into Dominican Amber. I disagree, as Caribbean Amber and Dominican Amber are two distinctively different elements. Dominican Amber is a natural, untreated product of nature, originating from the Dominican Republic. Caribbean Amber is an artificially produced product made of Copal (Colombian or Baltic). If anything it should be merged with the Copal article, although I find it stands well on its own. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.80.145.129 (talk) 20:26, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

copal

[edit]

Why do you think, that fossil resin in age of 15 until 17 Million years ist subfossil copal? Why subfossil? ... and why copal?-- Hl1948 (talk) 13:54, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dominican amber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]