Talk:Dominica at the 2008 Summer Olympics

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dominica at the 2008 Summer Olympics article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dominica at the 2008 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 12, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caribbean: Dominica

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Dominica.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dominica at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 20:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 19:36, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

This is not a formal review, Dom497 is doing it. The article is very interesting, even though that is not a criteria for passage. Auchansa (talk) 04:47, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering about the little symbols used on some of the section headings. Don't think that's allowed per MoS:Section headings: "Headings should not contain images, including flag icons." MathewTownsend (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Auchansa: Can you please clarify what you are trying to say? @MathewTownsend: I guess not.--Dom497 (talk) 19:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What I am saying is that I like the article. I haven't gone through all the technical criteria but Dom497 is doing that. I am just saying that the general readability and way it interests the reader is there. Good work, whoever wrote it.Auchansa (talk) 04:50, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. I've noticed many Olympics articles have had these images. I think that there may have been some decision within the Olympic WikiProject at one point to incorporate those images into all the headers. I'll ask around. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 20:10, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I made some changes to the article but other than that, nothing else needs to be fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 19:36, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]