Talk:Domestic duck
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Domestic Mallard/Comments)
![]() | Domestic duck has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 2, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Domestic duck appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 July 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hey man im josh talk 18:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- ... that duck farming on Long Island got a boost from a big duck (pictured)?
- Source: "The building was ... intended as a farm shop as well as for publicity" / https://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/14/nyregion/nyregionspecial2/14colli.html
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Teri Ore
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Dan Erlewine
- Comment: This has incubated a long time. I started Big Duck in 2006 and finally got around to getting it up to GA standards. By coincidence, I saw that Chiswick Chap had just put Domestic duck up for review. We reviewed each other's GA noms, which as far as I can tell from WP:DYKRR is not a problem.
Improved to Good Article status by RoySmith (talk) and Chiswick Chap (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 39 past nominations.
RoySmith (talk) 18:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC).
Hah, the Big Duck image looks great. Yeah, I think the round-robin with the reviewing is fine here. Great articles all around; both are eligible and high-quality. Source checks out, as do both QPQs. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not to be the pedantic spoilsport, but "got a boost" is too vague of a claim to be definitively true or false. Hook can definitely be salvaged by mentioning how it got a boost, so this probably won't hold up the nomination. Bremps... 11:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that a big duck (pictured) helped promote duck farming on Long Island'?
RoySmith (talk) 14:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that a big duck (pictured) helped promote duck farming on Long Island'?
- Not to be the pedantic spoilsport, but "got a boost" is too vague of a claim to be definitively true or false. Hook can definitely be salvaged by mentioning how it got a boost, so this probably won't hold up the nomination. Bremps... 11:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Agriculture, food and drink good articles
- GA-Class Agriculture articles
- Mid-importance Agriculture articles
- WikiProject Agriculture articles
- GA-Class bird articles
- Low-importance bird articles
- Top-importance Poultry task force articles
- Poultry task force articles
- WikiProject Birds articles
- GA-Class Food and drink articles
- Low-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles