Jump to content

Talk:Dol Guldur/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Surprisingly good article for a topic that is not major in the books.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    still needs work; see closing statement/note.
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    A few things appear to be borderline OR, but I noted them through a {{fact}} template or a <!--...--> note...so I think that you will fix them.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    This is written in a partly in-universe style for some, but considering that it's kinda hard not to (with Tolkien's legendarium) I'll pass it.
    B. Focused:
    Veered off a bit at points, but I believe that I fixed them with my edits.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Could use a few more images, but there just aren't many out there for this kind of article; I know this from my experience with Shannara articles.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Please work on the prose; I fixed some but not all--I've read LotR, but not as indepth as this, so I can't change a few parts bacause I don't know what happened in the books, and I don't want to change the meaning of a sentence so that I give a false history. Very, very informative and an interesting read. the_ed17 14:14, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Today

[edit]

As of today the article looks like this at GA. Lord of Moria Talk Contribs 14:35, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]