Talk:Djokovic–Nadal rivalry

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Tennis Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennis To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Take an item off the Cleanup listing
Copyedit : Roger Federer, Leander Paes, Rafael Nadal, Justine Henin – to be used as examples for ideal page structures
Expand : Grab a Start article and expand it, or peruse the List of articles.
Photo : Add photos to Tennis or Tennis people articles
Stubs : Bring a Stub up to our standards.
Other : *Sign up as a member of the project.
Tag more articles with our standard project template.
Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.

Serbia Low‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

original research

The "skill comparison" section is very technical and not supported by the mentioned source (a blog post). We have to avoid original research. Please do not remove the tags again without addressing this issue. MakeSense64 (talk) 09:13, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is original research, but it may be true (as opposed to blatant lies). I added "Unreferenced-section" to give this editor time to find the sources or else we'll have to remove it. Gotta have those sources. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:28, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the tags have been removed again, twice. It makes no sense to edit war about this. Original research (even if 'true') is a non-starter on WP. We need sources, and since this is about living persons we have to remove it immediately. WP:BLPREMOVE. So, I am doing that now. The material can always be brought back with sources. MakeSense64 (talk) 09:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there no sense to edit war about this and stop reverted my changes, it already have references and sources, please do not remove my changes, I will back this on normal, please respect my freedom to edit pages normal on Wikipedia. Thank you Soundwaweserb (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:00, 30 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The material in the 'skill comparison' section is in no way backed up by the source #37, which is a questionable source anyway. Removing unsourced or poorly sourced material about living persons is a firm policy on WP. These WP policies come before your 'freedom' to edit. Are you here to respect the WP policies? If so, then I invite you once again to remove the materials, or bring reliable sources that support the text in this section. MakeSense64 (talk) 10:28, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to respect me like editor, this is vandalism by you, is there references? Yes, and what is problem? Please I invite you to stop reverting my changes and I find more references for this page or skill comparison. Thank you.Soundwaweserb (talk) 11:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a reference, but it doesn't support the text in that section. That's the problem. We can give you some time to find proper sources for it, but then you better restore the tag Fyunck put on that section until you bring the needed sources. Then we can see that you also respect the other editors, and are acknowledging the problem with that section.

Remember that we are supposed to assume good faith WP:AGF. When other editors put a tag on the article, it is not vandalism, it is an attempt to get it improved. In fact, in this case WP requires us to remove the unsourced material immediately, because this is about living persons. By putting on a tag and giving you some time we are actually being patient. MakeSense64 (talk) 11:25, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Career evolution table

Don't know who messed with the table, but it is screwed up. Compare it with any other on some of the rivalries articles. Age at the end of the season should not be the same, as Nadal was born one year before Djokovic... --Jdjerich (talk) 12:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Djokovic–Nadal rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ATP Masters Titles

Why is the Paris Masters coloured in purple, not matching either surface (hard or clay) from the legend? SquashEngineer (talk) 15:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Djokovic - Nadal Era

The tables seems incomplete, with the superscripts of the winner D or N missing from the tournaments in the table below the Grand Slams. SquashEngineer (talk) 15:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]