Talk:Diversnight

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the sources listed at http://www.diversnight.com/download/articles look pretty impressive. I was doing some due diligence prior to my intended tagging of this page, but the event claims eight years of attendance, 2749 divers on 218 dive sites in 20 countries in 2009. That's an assertion of importance to me. If these Norwegian sources hold up, I think this passes the bar for multiple independent secondary sources directly detailing the subject. It may not pass WP:EVENT, but it's not a hoax, and it seems well documented. There may be minor copyvio issues, but normal editing could fix this. --BusterD (talk) 03:56, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tha bar for A7 is low, and that sounds like enough to beat it. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:24, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering about notability myself. It would be good to get a few more references onto the page. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 08:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No inter-language link

Is there an equivalent article in a Norwegian Wikipedia? • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 08:29, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Diversnight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]