Talk:Diu (Cantonese)

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (21)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (291)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,052)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,472) • Stub-Class articles (6,696)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (388) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,340)

I fail to see exactly what is inappropriate about the tone of this article. It's serious and descriptive - its only real flaw is it doesn't go into enough detail. If the objection is to the subject matter I suggest you check out fuck which no one is complaining about. 202.161.1.156 15:05, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

notice: given that there has been no discussion of the above -- I am going to remove the tone notice in a couple of days unless there is some objections. Certainly I think the article needs a bit of clean up (I do not know how to type chinese - so I cannot do it) but I think the tone is ok. Comments welcome. novacatz 09:06, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

verifiability

Nearly none of the content of this article is, in my opinion, verifiable. Could the main contributor, or anyone else, please provide sources for information? Otherwise, I think we'll need to clean up most of the article. Thanks JSIN 06:39, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the "Five Great Profanities of the Clan Door" can probably be removed. The examples from classical texts were added by me, I guess they are not inverifiable...--K.C. Tang 09:42, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Original character

In the Ming Dynasty, the character 丢 was used in literature for this word. This should be mentioned in the article. 24.93.190.134 02:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

??

I don't think we use 𨳒 in Hong Kong. Derekleungtszhei (talk) 04:43, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diu (Cantonese). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131213183044/http://hongkong.sakura.ne.jp/c-1.html to http://hongkong.sakura.ne.jp/c-1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]