Talk:Ditchley Park

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Page Move

This page has been called Ditchley since its inception. I think it would be clearer if it were called either Ditchley House, as per Historic England, or Ditchley Park, which it has historically been known as. Ditchley on its own sounds more like a place than a building. I shall move in a day or so, unless there are objections. KJP1 (talk) 13:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC) '[reply]

Done. KJP1 (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing style

I would like to do a bit of expansion on this. Is there any objection to my flipping the reference style to sfn? There are only half a dozen such references. KJP1 (talk) 10:08, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]