Talk:Disney Publishing Worldwide

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[National Geographic Partners#Publications|NG Media]] The anchor (#Publications) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sophialester.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:36, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for article

Could someone create an article for the current President Deborah Dugan? Thanks! Jccort (talk) 17:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for update

The new owner/parent is Panini - Alex64

07:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Disney Hyperion

Two years ago the redirect Disney Hyperion was re-targeted from Hyperion Books (aka Hyperion Books for Children) to this page by User:Spshu. --presumably without consideration of 100 pages that link Disney Hyperion, i infer from the large number and finding no relevant talk.

Four years ago Disney Hyperion was moved to Hyperion Books, following a claim that "all book information" uses the latter and a supporting remark that 'I don't think I've ever heard it called "Disney Hyperion".' Talk:Hyperion Books#Requested move

I don't know why so many articles link Disney Hyperion but take for granted that many should link Hyperion Books rather than this page.

Is there good reason Disney Hyperion should redirect here? --P64 (talk) 18:31, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Directing discussion to Talk:Hyperion Books#Hyperion Books and Disney Hyperion as more information was proved at there. Spshu (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information Update

Under the Waterfire Saga heading it says that DPW Milan will release graphic novels and comic books in 2015. I have not been able to find anything showing that these have been released. Can someone verify this? Or should it just be cut? Christina Duke (talk) 21:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cannot seem to find any info either way. I changed it to planned ("..was schedule...", but not issue. If you want to cut it all together then go ahead. Spshu (talk) 15:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Franchise discussion

Inclusion of Plot Details

I suggest that the plot details of various products Disney Publishing has produced do NOT belong in an article on the history of the business. They are more properly useful in an article about the books themselves. Any consensus on removing the plots? Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not just the history of the business given it is a creative business. It has a franchise section which seems reasonable to have a short paragraph of sourced plot. An alternative might be to add DPW's franchises with DCP's franchises into a "Franchises of DCP" article, since DPW is a subsidiary of DCP. Spshu (talk) 18:35, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support removal per Twofingered Typist. Likewise, I think that the entire "Franchises" section should be spun off into a series of separate articles, which can then be expanded upon. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 21:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and by the by, I think the Franchises section is unnecessarily bloating up the article and violates WP:UNDUE. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 21:16, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They should not be "a series of separate articles" as they are not yet notable on their own. Franchises are (currently) important to creative business entities like DPW, so UNDUE does not apply. --Spshu (talk) 12:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revisiting Franchises?

Hi all,

Just wanted to revisit the franchises discussion from 2016. Is it necessary to include these plot details from various Disney Publishing franchises, especially if it is an incomplete list? I'm unclear if the three listed franchises are the only franchises under Disney Publishing Worldwide, but the article seems to imply that. (In addition, the references for those statements are a bit filsmy... references 36 and 41 don't seem to show that these are the only franchises that Disney is creating.) Perhaps a "Franchises of DCP" article may be reasonable, as it seems that Artemis Fowl, Rick Riordan, and many other books all fall under the umbrella of Disney Publishing Worldwide. ChunyangD (talk) 04:35, 12 November 2018‎

@Twofingered Typist, Electricburst1996, and Spshu:

Lots of lists are incomplete and some may never be completed. Where do you get that there are "if the three listed franchises are the only franchises under Disney Publishing Worldwide, but the article seems to imply that."? If you are getting that then you are not reading the article and are just looking at the index. Why? Click straight on Disney Publishing Worldwide#Franchises as there is a bulleted list of 6(!!!) DPW franchises plus discussion of DCP franchise that DPW was brought into. Of course the sources don't indicated "these are the only franchises that Disney is creating." -- this is a limited list to those of DPW, as Disney Consumer Products has its own Franchise section and DPW services other Disney unit franchises. Some of the franchises have their own article thus did not get sections here.

Just having a book line or series is not enough for a franchise, they need to be in other media. Percy Jackson & the Olympians or Rick Riordan (one of them) might be consider a franchise - Riordan having multiple lines of books, an imprint and one line being partly done as movies. The books started at Miramax Books, thus I must have considered it to not be a DPW franchise.

As far as splitting it out as a separate article, it is hard to find an article to support list articles as notable. I did try suggest that splitting out Disney Consumer Products (to which DPW was a part of) franchises with DPW's into an article to strength the notability. Spshu (talk) 20:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Spshu: Thanks for the clarification! And my bad for saying three instead of six - I did mean six!

In that case, can we add a tag stating that "This list is incomplete"? I came to this page because of Rick Riordan, and was confused because it seemed like Rick Riordan's series was not part of Disney-Hyperion, even though the imprint showed that it was.

For my own clarification, does this mean that this franchises section is intended for franchises created by the DPW brand? If so, that might be the most helpful line to add in! I'm not in the publishing/media industry, so I'm honestly not very clear about the differences between a publishing company, the brands it controls, and the franchises it creates. So, speaking from a lay-person perspective, it would be helpful to just add a sentence marking the difference :)

Thanks again for your reply and clarifications! ChunyangD (talk) 13:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Waterfire Saga edit revert question

I'm not sure why my edit regarding the release of the forth book in the Waterfire Saga was reverted. The revert from Spshu has the comment "unsourced", but the book (Waterfire Saga, Book Four: Sea Spell) already had a link to Amazon, clearly showing that it was released on June 14, 2016. JBnAZ (talk) 00:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Star Darlings edit reversion

My edit regarding the release of the Star Darlings books 3-14 was reverted. The revert from Spshu has the comment "not reliable sources", but other links on the page do have Amazon references, and the other books received no press releases aside from Good Wish Gone Bad. What would be a reliable source in this circumstance? (This link shows all of the books which can be sourced individually but I was worried it'd be removed again. http://books.disney.com/?s=star+darlings) 99.19.14.79 (talk) 23:41, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]