Talk:Discursive dilemma

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

I recommend that we add a link to Simpson's paradox, as this seems to be a subset of that, independently discovered. I made my wikipedia account only about 2 minutes ago, and so I'm reluctant to do anything to this article myself. 23chaosmosis (talk) 02:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-- I know the professor in question, he said:

"But I merely generalized the doctrinal paradox in the law, which Christian List’s bibliography must cite, and it was only with Christian himself (in our 2002 paper) that I showed that it arises even under non-majority voting procedures that meet certain conditions." 2605:A601:A08A:C200:A19F:F26:74E9:FAAB (talk) 02:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC) --[reply]