This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Discovery 7.9 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sailing Low‑importance

	Discovery 7.9 is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

The sales brochure clearly names the boat as the "Discovery 79," and the sail insignia is "D79" and not "D7.9." The Grampian Owner's website calls it the "Discovery 7.9." Is there some Grampian-sourced literature that refers to the boat as the "7.9" and not the "79?" Susan Davis (talk) 14:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We are relying here on the cited third party ref. Is there a copy of the original brochure or other official documents available on line anywhere to support "79" instead of "7.9"?? - Ahunt (talk) 16:08, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]