Talk:Disaster preparedness (cultural property)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Collections Care, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Collections CareWikipedia:WikiProject Collections CareTemplate:WikiProject Collections CareCollections Care articles

Disaster management Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.

Remove superfluous information

I agree, some information could be removed, I don't know if the type of emergency is important, that list seems superfluous. The list of phone numbers as well. This isn't a 'how to'. The 'See Also' section also seems unnecessary.

I agree with the phone numbers being superfluous information. I have removed them.Caroline Randy (talk) 02:32, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see the article cleaned up, more links to other articles in Wikipedia, and more links to case studies, for example, famous hurricanes like Hurricane Sandy had a coordinated emergency response, the Fire at Windsor Castle as well comes to mind. I think Salvage and Disaster Recovery would include an emergency response plan.

You could link more with these pages - https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Emergency_management

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Disaster_response

Linked to Disaster response Wikipedia page.Caroline Randy (talk) 02:31, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The terms salvage and disaster preparedness should also be linked to this section.

Rose Daly (talk) 10:25, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COMMENT

STILL A WORK IN PROGRESS I'M STILL ACTIVELY WORKING ON THIS!

--Jmadre1 (talk) 22:22, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Change title? Disaster Preparedness focus

I think this page should be renamed 'Disaster Preparedness (cultural property)' as that's mostly what this page is about. Risk management is used in cultural organisations for a number of reasons now other than disaster preparedness - project management, treatments, long-term collection preservation planning etc. It would be good to highlight the main risk assessment approaches (eg CPRAM and the 'ABC' method) that have shaped a lot of preventive conservation activities and thinking for the last two decades, and include some case studies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinknantucket (talk • contribs) 00:14, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Significant changes made during edit-a-thon

Hello...as part of an edit-a-thon I did rename the page (as discussed above) and substantially revised it. I hope you don't mind! I moved quite a lot of information from the agents of deterioration headings to a new dedicated page (Agents of deterioration), including pictures and references, and then revised the remaining text for a disaster preparedness focus rather than risk assessments. I also made a new page Risk management for cultural heritage to talk about the wider application of risk management in the sector (not just as it relates to disaster preparedness). I removed detail that seemed specific to one kind of disaster preparedness approach and references to US-based assistance numbers and tried to make it more general. Pinknantucket (talk) 10:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]