Talk:Dirty Dozen (bicycle competition)

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

infobox - women's winner(s)

Not sure how to add the most recent women's winner and the women's winner w/ most titles to the infobox. If anyone can help, please advise. Thanks! joepa^T 01:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women's races generally have their own article, but a possible workaround is to have both with the gender in brackets. Bald Boris 17:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

categorization - 1958?

Hi User:BaldBoris just a quick question - what's the rationale behind adding the category [[1958 establishments in the United States]] to the article? (from this dif: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Dirty_Dozen_(bicycle_competition)&direction=next&oldid=752538441) I'm definitely confused, so just thought I'd ask here. Thanks! joepa^T 06:48, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just a typo as I'd copied and pasted it from another race. Fixed. Bald Boris 17:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

gotcha. thanks for clarifying, BaldBoris. Btw: I'm working on getting images for both this article and Danny Chew. Have been corresponding with two photographers, have identified suitable images from their galleries, and just waiting for confirmation that they're willing to license them appropriately, after which I'll upload them to Commons and work through the OTRS system to confirm permission. joepa^T 20:31, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

So I've worked out a deal with two photographers so far who are donating images from Dirty Dozen to Wikimedia Commons. Some are already in the Commons, but those focus on just Danny Chew. As soon as I get the remaining images uploaded and categorized and what not I'll advise here and will pick a lead/main image. joepa^T 07:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]