Talk:Dirt sheet

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 28 August 2008 by reviewer Legoktm (talk · contribs).

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	Dirt sheet is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fightful listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fightful. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:31, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"WhatCulture" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WhatCulture. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:43, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What?!

The key problem many people in the wrestling business have with the dirt sheets isn't breaking kayfabe. It's that the 'information' in the dirt sheets is a load of mistruths, with blatant bias and personal agendas. Various people have stated this in video interviews, but does it require print sources?

Also, the few wrestlers who praise the dirt sheets are the same ones the dirt sheet writers praise in their sheets. Hardly coincidental.

In addition, the Observer is definitely NOT the first.