Talk:Dipterocarpaceae

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Forestry (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2021 and 7 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Minecraftenvs.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sources?

Hopea and Dryobalanops are listed as being over 80 m tall, but no source is given. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.133.7.37 (talk) 15:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References added. Krasanen (talk) 21:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article could be bigger and with red words in BLUE, please

"why are they important? what habitat are they living? what animals eat their seeds? are they important economically? what minerals or grounds they need?" I ask you if you could enlarge Dipterocarpaceae making better known this group of trees in Wikipedia, adding links to "Dipterocarpaceae" and information about "Dipterocarpaceae" existence on topics as trees articles in tropical articles or botanical or biodiversity articles. You are welcome if you want edit this article, Lauraceae or some genera or species in these families or another one. Really, there are few knowledge about tropical and subtropical trees and they are so many. I thank you very much your help.Curritocurrito (talk) 20:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Knowledge of Dipterocarpaceae

The following was copied here by User:Curritocurrito:

Hi Curritocurrito, thanks for your post at WikiProject Forestry. If you could elaborate a little more either there or at Talk:Dipterocarpaceae about what specific additions you might suggest for that article, that would be helpful. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 19:04, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I suggest that you add your questions -- "why are they important? what habitat are they living? what animals eat their seeds? are they important economically? what minerals or grounds they need?" -- to the Talk:Dipterocarpaceae page. That will help others think about how they might contribute to that article. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 20:03, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get much time to edit Wikipedia pages, but am slowly trying to creat stubs for all the Dipterocarps and correct errors in existing stubs/article. If anyone is interested in editing these pages and needs access to primary sources - I have a reasonable collection of papers (mainly for SE Asia) and can send pdfs.
RE: the questions raised above
are they important economically? - they use to be the main timber export from SE Asia. I don't have figures for what % of the timber trade they account for now
what minerals or grounds they need?- variable - there is a high degree of habitat speacilsation. Some species only occur in Peatswamps, other in poor sand soils i.e. heath forests, others on rich clay soils.
what animals eat their seeds? - when they fruit, which varies from yearly in some of the Sri Lankan species to onces every x (2-16) years in some of the Borneo species - they are an important food source. Sepilok2007 (talk) 23:16, 23 May 2012 (UTC) ***Preceding unsigned comment added by Curritocurrito (talk • contribs) [reply]

These trees are both economically and ecologically important - although disappearing fast! I am trying to clarify what we have here in Cat Tien National Park and will contribute - although only an amateur botanist ... Roy Bateman (talk) 03:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted to an older version

I reverted the page back to the May 2012 version. I did this because much of what was added was complete rubbish and not worth the time editing. Sepilok2007 (talk) 11:54, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ecology section

Much of the ecology info is incorrect. Bees are only important for the large flowered species - Parashorea, Dipterocarpus and some of the larger flowered Shoreas. Most of the other use a mixture of thrips/beetles. Most species don't flower annually, but participate in the General FloweringSepilok2007 (talk) 06:43, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps this is an example of relying on a single flora, in this case perhaps the one for Thailand. (I don't have access to that document.) I've seen that sort of thing happen with the Flora of China, which is very accessible online, that the description only covers the taxa that occur in China, but some editors don't realize that the species that occur elsewhere have different characteristics. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 16:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree Sminthopsis - the Thai Dipts are also only a small portion of the Dipts. A slightly better easily accessibl source would be the CIFOR publications on Dipterocarps — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepilok2007 (talk • contribs) 23:14, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dipterocarpaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101213041459/http://delta-intkey.com/angio/ to http://delta-intkey.com/angio/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070103200438/http://delta-intkey.com:80/ to http://delta-intkey.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]