Talk:Dione arcuata

Protista Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Protista, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of protists and protistology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ProtistaWikipedia:WikiProject ProtistaTemplate:WikiProject ProtistaProtista articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Algae Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Algae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the photosynthetic organisms commonly called algae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AlgaeWikipedia:WikiProject AlgaeTemplate:WikiProject AlgaeAlgae articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that an image or photograph of an in situ or specimen photo be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

A fact from Dione arcuata appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that eyelash seaweed may have been made extinct by a single 2016 earthquake?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dione arcuata.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 22:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that eyelash seaweed may have been made extinct by a single 2016 earthquake? Source: "since the earthquake.. no Dione has been reported" Conservation status of New Zealand macroalgae, 2019; "One of the sites was completely buried in the 2016 earthquake and the other was affected by uplift. The species... has not been found since." Not enough known about Kiwi seaweeds
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hirbemerdon Tepe
- Comment: An older QPQ, but it should still check out.

Created by Fritzmann2002 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Dione arcuata; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Approved -- a short but nicely-written article, well sourced and long enough for GA. Created within the window and no evident signs of plagiarism, copyvio or other major concerns. Fascinating hook: the first source is a little more cautious than we might have been (it does, after all, point out that relatively little has been done to find Dione since the earthquake), but I think we're covered by may have been and the general understanding that DYK errs on the side of being interesting rather than pedantic. QPQ done: I don't think there's an expiration date on those. Nice work. UndercoverClassicist ^T·C 12:45, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]