Talk:Dinaric race

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Ethnic groups

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

serious?

Is this serious? just wondering --AN 19:42 Feb 20, 2003 (UTC)

There is indeed a "Dinaric" type in physical anthropology. Actually, Dinaric types are found throughout the world, but are common in the West Balkans. I am not sure if Slobodan Milosevic is the best example, as he is rather short and stocky he would be more of an "Alpine".

Anyway, this classification is serious (or at least was serious until the 1960's), though of course, most scientists have moved away from these sorts of physical catagories, and now focus on genetic differences among populations.

Other such categorizations include "Nordic", "Alpine", "Mediterranean", and so on. I am sure a lot of people find these highly questionable.

It has to be taken into consideration that a HUGE proportion of the world's population is racially mixed to some extent or another, and to say the least that complicates any attempts at classification. Gringo300 10:13, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You should add that modern Dinarics are the tallest people in the world:

Pineau JC,Delamarche P,Bozinovic S.[Average height of adolescents in the Dinaric Alps] "This study contributes to an update of average heights among European populations. Our investigation covering 2705 boys and 2842 girls aged 17 years, shows that, contrary to the general belief, adolescents of the Dinaric Alps are, on average, the tallest in Europe. With an average height of 185,6 cm, they are taller than Dutch adolescents (184 cm on average). Above all, the density of very tall subjects appears to be characteristic of the Dinaric Alps, since 28% measure 190 cm or more in height, as opposed to only 20% in Holland and 1.5% in France. Although our information is not complete, adolescent girls in the Dinaric Alps, with an average height of 171 cm come a close second to girls in Holland."

Areas

The article mentioned Northern Italy being a Dinaric area. Could the southern regions of Switzerland also be considered as such? And what about Croatia?

Italian speaking area of Switzerland are also Dinaric, with some other strains.Croatia is not particulary Dinaric since Dalmatia is mostly Atlantid while the Zagreb centered area of Zagorje is mostly Alpine with some Nordic and Dinaric strains.Alpines are also the main population of Croatia's Slavonia region.

Are the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary also Dinaric areas?

Came across this information from http://med1nuc11.dfc.unifi.it/linnets/troe/texts/p36.htm:

Although the Czechs themselves are predominantly Alpine, the Moravians and Slovaks are frequently Dinaric.

As for the Hungarians, haven’t found anything yet.

Not found in Hungary? Hahaha! I live in Hungary, and the Dinarid relatively common in Hungary (mostly Southern Transdanubia), but Budapest and Northern Hungary mostly Alpinid, Baltid with some Nordid influence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.165.206.39 (talk • contribs)

softeners

It seems that "We are all the same" crowd took over the article, with the usual softeners and euphemisms and other PC jargon acrobations.As long as we all pay cash, we are all equal, right?A head,two arms, two legs, five fingers each and you are good at everything like everybody else.......

I'm not sure what an "acrobation" is, but I don't see any PC jargon here. As far as I am aware the concept of a "Dinaric race" is not used in modern anthropology. However, if you have examples of mainstream professional modern usage, add them. The main criticism of the concept that's included here comes from the notoriously PC Carelton Coon! Paul B 11:20, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Serbia, or Montenegro?

According to the Dinaric model, Dinarics are to be found today in the mountainous areas of the western Balkans (Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia and Montenegro, most of northwestern Bulgaria, northwestern Republic of Macedonia and northern Albania).

Between Serbia and Montenegro, would it be safe to say that mountainous Montenegro is the more Dinaric of the two? I’m asking because we may soon have to replace Serbia and Montenegro with simply Montenegro once the latter officially declares independence, and because Serbia from what I know is mostly plains, except for Kosovo.

I see that Serbia and Montenegro in that quoted passage was split into Serbia and Montenegro. However, given that Serbia is relatively flat (and the passage states that Dinarics are found mostly in the “the mountainous areas of the western Balkans”), do we still need to include it in the enumeration, or should we remove it?

Well it's difficult to say. Deniker's orginal map seems to exclude most of Serbia, but Serbia is left white, and thus not allocated to any labelled "race" at all, as you can see (click image to enlarge). Paul B 10:54, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Serbians living in the political entity 'Republic of Serbia' are predominantly Dinaric, although to a certain extents they represent the southeastern periphery of the Dinaric race, and also place of settlement of many Serbs from Montenegro and other more uniformly Dinaric areas.Günther's, Coon's, maps and studies of that particular area seem to suggest that at least the single most prevalent type among these Eastern Serbs is that of Dinaric race, with several other Caucasoid variants also present in the population.

Off topic, it is a pity for the science that these categorizations have been abandoned for the several last decades, when it is obvious that even a layman may easily categorize various Caucasoid variants at a glance, after studing several classic books on the subject. A tour over Europe would quickly confront any skeptic with the fact that these categories ,indeed, do exist, both as pockets of populations, in transitional zones, and as more compact, simmilar stocks over wider areas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.77.159.210 (talk • contribs)

The "Dinaric race"-concept can be really valid, when viewed genetically. Dinarics are the "cleanest" descendants of paleolithic hunters of the gravettian culture, who found a refuge around the Adriatic Sea in the end of the last ice age. This is obvious from the fact that the area with the most dense presence of the "Dinaric race" has the highest percentage of Y-haplogroup I. But don't worry, the old concepts will be revived again, after the social utopias created by Pc egalitarians crash everywhere in the world.Centrum99 09:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC) Centrum99 09:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources? Direct copy?

There are no sources other than a Franz Boas reference at the end, but the 3rd and 4th and last paragraph all sound as if they come directly from a textbook. Should these sections be in block quotes? Where is this outdated material coming from, anyway?--Parkwells (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article is quite clear about the sources for the idea - originally Deniker and then Günther, Coon and the other usual-suspects among mid-20th century anthropologists, including text books such as Meyers Blitz-Lexikon. Coon wrote about "dinarics" repeatedly in the Races of Europe and numerous essays ("Occipital flattening among the Dinarics") etc. I don't know if the passage in the middle is a quotation or not. I did try to find out if it was a while ago, but couldn't find a source. Paul B (talk) 09:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant was that some of those paragraphs sounded like direct quotes from an early 20th c. encyclopedia or textbook. I think the article needs to be supplemented with at least a paragraph or more about how this approach was discredited, or why contemporary anthropologists don't use it - what was the criticism or new information.--Parkwells (talk) 13:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I knew what you meant. That's why I said "I don't know if the passage in the middle is a quotation or not. I did try to find out if it was a while ago, but couldn't find a source." It sounded cut-n-pasteish to me too, but I could find no evidence that it was. Maybe I just didn't look hard enough. I don't think the idea was ever discredited as such. It just came to be seen as largely useless. Even Coon eventually uses the term simply to mean nothing more than a local "type". It wasn't killed off so much as died out. Paul B (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am Shocked by the use of the word race since genetic proved that their is but one Human race, and therefore I propose that all race word should be changed by ethny...

any comment? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.124.254.206 (talk) 15:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's called a race, like it or not. Paul B (talk) 22:25, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am shocked that people can't use their own brain and parrot these demagogic, ideological statements over and over again like a hypnotized herd of sheep. Centrum99 (talk) 23:50, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Really no genetic basis?

"The Dinaric race (or Adriatic race or Epirotic race) is one of the sub-categories of the Europid (White; Caucasian) race into which it was divided by physical anthropologists in the early 20th century. Such racial typologies have been increasingly criticized for several reasons, especially since the rise of molecular anthropology."

A funny statement, really, considering that genetics clearly showed that Dinaric highlanders are predominantly Slavicized Paleolithic autochthons, former bearers of the Gravettian culture. Centrum99 (talk) 22:40, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bully for them. Does being "Slavicized Paleolithic autochthons" makes them a race? I thought almost all Europeans are "Paleolithic autochthons". The French are Latinized Paleolithic autochthons. The British are Anglicized Paleolithic autochthons.... Paul B (talk) 17:27, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dinarics are not a race, but an easily defined anthropological type. Centrum99 (talk) 23:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What I find especially funny is that molecular anthropology rather supports these racial typologies - because every distinct physical type developed due to a founder effect and long isolation. And this is clearly visible in DNA. If Dinarics were isolated much longer from their neighbours, they would inevitably developed into a separate race. I wonder, if authors copying these obsolete statements from the beginnings of population genetics actually check, what has changed in the meantime. Centrum99 (talk) 23:48, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dinarisch.JPG Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Dinarisch.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dinaric race. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120511091339/http://dienekes.110mb.com/texts/biasutticaucasoid/ to http://dienekes.110mb.com/texts/biasutticaucasoid/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dinaric race. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudoscience and Present Tense

Why is this article so often in the present tense? This is racist pseudoscience masquerading as modern data. Steven Carleton Coons, who is referenced heavily throughout the page as a reliable source, was discredited during his own lifetime (according to the first paragraph in his own Wikipedia page!). This page needs major cleanup, as many of these contributions are blatantly racist. R2Unit (talk) 22:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]