Talk:Dimitar Glavchev

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Bulgaria Mid‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Infobox

Given the fact that no other page of a politician on Wikipedia contains references in regards to a specific office in its infobox, is it not best to prevent such edits, commonly conducted by one @Panam2014? Jorkdkskakaksjjsk (talk) 09:27, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jorkdkskakaksjjsk: removing reliables sources (including official sources such as state-run agency, and Constitution, and a well-known independent media, Sofia Globe) is a WP:VANDALISM. Time to stop. Sources have been added to avoid vandalism consisting on removing the fact he is a caretaker per Constitution. Your position is inconsistent. You say that no other page of a politician on Wikipedia contains references in regards to a specific office in its infobox but in reality you are not only removing supposedly superfluous references but also information. CC @Preime TH: please give an opinion. Panam2014 (talk) 10:03, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have notified User talk:ToBeFree already completed Preime TH (talk) 10:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Panam2014, while those may be reliable sources, their place is not in the infobox. As previously mentioned, no such references are a part of another politician’s Wikipedia page. Respectfully, I suggest placing them elsewhere in the page, considering the valuable information they provide. Jorkdkskakaksjjsk (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jorkdkskakaksjjsk: In this case, we move them but "caretaker" must remain on the infobox. I didn't understand your insistence on not only removing the sources, but also the caretaker mention. That you recognize that the sources are reliable is a good thing. Panam2014 (talk) 13:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is an alternative way, however, to indicate that he is a caretaker Prime Minister. Let me suggest an edit in the article page. Jorkdkskakaksjjsk (talk) 18:52, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jorkdkskakaksjjsk: thanks. But sources should be used in the article. Panam2014 (talk) 20:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]