Jump to content

Talk:Dilema veche

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Very dubious claim on Dilema Veche's politics

[edit]

In the article "Most editorialists of Dilema veche espouse conservative and neoconservative views." No citation. From the maybe two dozen issues of Dilema Veche I've read, it does not strike me as true. It seems to me that the most consistent political view of Dilema Veche is one of toleration, especially of ethnic and sexual minorities. This would not usually be characterized in Romania (or much of anywhere) as a "conservative" view. And it's uncited. - Jmabel | Talk 20:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three weeks, no response, no citation,I am removing this. - Jmabel | Talk 01:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dilema veche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]