Talk:Digital Performer

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Professional sound production Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

What is this article meant to do. It looks like a software promotion page here on wikipedia !

I agree. I think the article has value (Performer/Digital Performer does have a place in personal computer sequencer/DAW history) and there's good info on its lineage here, but there's an obvious point of view.

Page was cleaned up to remove pov, focus on the subject at hand and get a more neutral tone. Hellgi 21:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When I get the chance, I will be restoring much of what Hellgi removed. This account was intended to be an historical account. Now it has been pared down to what resembles a press release. Many important lines were removed which gave significant context, especially in regard to the differences between DP and Pro Tools, points which are at the center of the native audio revolution. People wonder why use anything except Pro Tools, and this explained the differences, but it's gone now. There are other examples, but I will simply restore parts of what was there, and try to make it as factual as possible. If it seems that there is a POV, it's because Digital Performer was from the beginning at the center of the native audio model as a serious alternative to the Pro Tools model. We must not let this context slip from the written history. It is the driving force behind the Digital Audio Workstation's need for faster computers (which affect Pro Tools very little). Let's not be so over-zealous in our edits, please. What seems like unnecessary point of view to one person is important historical context to those who are trying to learn the facts, and those facts need to be available to all. You've removed the tension, the struggle between competing models which gets more exciting every year. I will fix it, but not today. Shooshie 13:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Shooshie[reply]

I can't really sign in to properly change it, but Alan Menken also uses the program "exclusively" http://cdn3.libsyn.com/musicaltalk/mt_ep_0063.mp3?nvb=20080913221908&nva=20080914221908&t=04ce7ce90918f9a84be65 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.114.135.25 (talk) 03:49, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Electronic Musician Editors Choice Awards

Digital performer has won accolades as the best "Digital Audio Workstation/Audio Interface" multiple years in Electronic Musician. 2001 [1], 2002 [2] 2004[3].

I think it has won in that category at least one other occasion. This information could be added to the article to further support popularity within the industry. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 14:30, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, you're welcome to go ahead and add that info. --Tikilounge (talk) 22:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, then. Going to cull some other articles and will integrate into article in the near future. Thanks. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 15:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A proposal to remove the cleanup template ...

... that was applied in May 2008, without supplying a cleanup reason. My reasons for removing the template are:

No new issues with the article have appeared on the talk page for 7 years or more.
The article is properly structured and clearly written.
Having exhaustively reviewed the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, I find no reason to require further cleanup – although editors can, of course, further improve the article.

In accordance with the MoS, I'm now seeking to establish a consensus here on removing that template.

Thoughts?

yoyo (talk) 15:50, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to merge AudioDesk into this article ...

... is outstanding since December 2015. From what I know of both packages, it seems logical to include AudioDesk as a less functional, Mac-only version of Digital Performer.

Support per above. yoyo (talk) 16:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and

Done Klbrain (talk) 13:18, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Digital Performer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Digital Performer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://earbox.com/inter004.html
Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.apple.com/pro/profiles/elfman/index2.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.imdb.com/paulhipp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.motu.com/products/software/dp/testimonials/atnewsitem.2004-11-01.7877542222
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gearwire.com/bradgillis-guitars.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513071728/http://musicaltalk.co.uk/episodes_0063.html to http://www.musicaltalk.co.uk/episodes_0063.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notable users section?

Are the people in the notable users section notable? Are they users? Do we need more references for this? RJFJR (talk) 12:30, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Digital Performer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]