Talk:Diggle, Greater Manchester

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greater Manchester Low‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page Move

I propose we move the page to Diggle, Greater Manchester, instead of the current title, in line with the other Saddleworth villages. See for example Lees, Greater Manchester, and Greenfield, Greater Manchester. M A Mason 21:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds sensible enough to me Aquilina 02:00, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Jhamez 84 10:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox added

I've just added the infobox, but I'm not all that happy with the data I've used. I can't find data for the population; and for grid references I used this site for the OS grid refernce, which seems reliable enough, but I've used this site for the latitude and longitude. I zoomed right into Diggle and took down the reference given and used that. It's a reference for Diggle but my only qualm is that it isn't the official reference if you see what I mean.

If I'm just being pedantic, ignore me ;) M A Mason 01:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, this makes perfect sense. I'm not sure where to find population totals for the various Saddleworth villages (it'd be great if we could find these). In the meantime, OS and lat and long co-ordinates can be verified via a number of sources (see here. I'll double check the settings from the official OS online mapping system listed there. Jhamez84 23:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The co-ordinates were correct! Great stuff!... Now on to the population problem.... Jhamez84 00:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really appropriate?

There is home-made 'Grandpa Greene's' ice-cream sold on the towpath near to Ward Lane. At the bottom of Ward Lane a traditional feast of Fish and Chips can be eaten from the Pringles Fish and Chips shop. If there's so little to say about a place - and I'm not saying that's necesarily the case with Diggle - except that it's got a couple of pubs, somewhere that sells ice cream and a fish and chip shop, ought one not to question whether it's worthy of an encyclopedia entry?

The language doesn't seem very encyclopedic in any event - "a traditional feast of Fish and Chips" - traditional to the village of Diggle? ---- Eric 16:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it's not a very encyclopedic paragraph, certainly, and not very notable information. I don't see why Diggle shouldn't have an article though. Needs work I know, and I will work on it soon enough. M A Mason 17:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why Diggle shouldn't have an article either, I was just commenting on the free advertising for Pringles Fish and Chip shop :) ---- Eric 19:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good hehe :) I've removed the offending paragraph. M A Mason 20:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category Oldham

Why does the Oldham Category keep being deleted and reinstated? Is there some dispute about whether Diggle's in the Metropolitan Borough of Oldham or not? ---- Eric 02:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some stupid edit war between two anonymous users. They're doing it to all the saddleworth articles. I'm hoping they'll give up soon... Failing that we'll have to get them banned or something. M A Mason 11:13, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No-one is disputing that Diggle is in OMB, but vandals like M A Mason and his cohorts seem to insist on adding a category'Oldham' to the article. 'Oldham' is the name of the article about the town, and they isnist on naming the borough category after the town article rather than the borough article which covers the the OMB articles. Diggle after all is in OMB not Oldham 88.104.44.134 18:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd appreciate it if you'd get your facts right; I haven't edited the category, so how you can accuse me of vandalizing it I don't know. So let's not throw around accusations, ok? Great. Now, over on the the wikiproject greater manchester page this debate is taking place in order to gain consensus, which is how wikipedia works. You, on the other hand, have removed the categories without doing so, with discussing it, and often (always?) without a summary. That is not what we're about here. M A Mason 18:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I livein Diggle. It is administered by Oldham Met Borough but is not in OLdham. It was part of the admin county of Gtr Manchester but this now has no admin power. The village is and always has been for the past 1000 years part of the Historic West Riding Of Yorkshire and would take an act of Parliament to remove this status. This has never been enacted. There is an ongoing Oldham problem mainly in relation to the name of Oldham town being used for the OMB rather than the more sensible approach such as Trafford and Tameside. New signs are going up soon on the historic Lancs/Yorks boundaries hopefully then everyone will know which county they live in ie Oldham town is in Lancashire and has never been anywhere else. The Metropolitan Counties were simply superimposed over the historic ones which they were never intended to replace. Ralph Oakes-Garnett Diggle Yorks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.10.60 (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Greater Manchester County Council Arms.png

Image:Greater Manchester County Council Arms.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Greater Manchester County Council Arms.png

Image:Greater Manchester County Council Arms.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]