Talk:Differential K theory
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Differential K theory article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 March 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
PROD
[edit]I don't think this page should be deleted (and it definitely doesn't qualify for uncontroversial deletion, which is what PROD is for). Differential K theory seems to easily pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines - of course saying that it's notable is completely independent from issues like whether it's debunked, fringe, correct, etc, etc. In any case, "walled garden of racialist research publications" is wrong. Personality and Individual Differences is peer-reviewed with respectable academics on its editorial board. https://www.elsevier.com/journals/personality-and-individual-differences/0191-8869/editorial-board NPalgan2 (talk) 23:56, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- You have misread my comments. Simply because Rushton managed to get it published in a more-or-less reputable journal doesn't change the fact that the only coverage of it from outside the walled garden of racialist publications has been criticism. And not much of that. So it's off to AfD, then. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 00:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Chmalyn: There's not much more to say about this fringe theory so rationally it should be merged into Race, Evolution, and Behavior, the book where this topic is mostly discussed. Onetwothreeip (talk) 02:30, 22 December 2019 (UTC)