Talk:Did It Again (Shakira song)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 19:08, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking up the review! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 02:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- General
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Info box
- Why is recorded 2008 and 2009?
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- This is an English language single, so Dexter doesn't need to be here.
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- As it is a dance song with elements of electropop and samba, electropop and samba should be removed.
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Lead
- is a song by recorded by → Spot the mistake
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Is Shakira credited in the booklet as a co-producer? As The Neptune's rarely allow co-production.
- I don't have the booklet, but many sites state Shakira as the producer of the song too. Shakira wrote and co-produced all the tracks on the album. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Use a different word than "lauded"
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Put US before Billboard
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Should write 'chart' after the name of the chart
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Background and composition
- from the album She Wolf → Comma after album
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- contains strong elements → Remove 'strong', it's superfluous in this context
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Critical reception
- received very → Remove 'very', sounds bias
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Music video
- I don't see the point of the one sentence block quote, just keep it as part of the prose.
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- This section could simply be two paragraphs.
- I made the section into three paras- Development, synopsis, and reception. Is that okay? Or shall I merge development and synopsis?--WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Live performances
- She definitely performed this song on The X Factor in the UK.
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Charts
- How come US Tropical isn't in the table if it peaked at 11?
- It is there. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- 2009 peaks should be in a separate table to 2010 peaks.
Done They were all 2009 peaks, I don't know why there was 10 there... --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- References
- MTV, Digital Spy, Allmusic, BBC, UK Singles Chart, iTunes etc. should not be italics.
- Ugh, I did this all in the beginning and some users used AWB and removed all the apostrophes. Well I'll do it again.
- They should never be in italics, they aren't newspaper/printed applications. Whoever told you to make them italics was wrong. — AARON • TALK
- No I used the apostrophes to just cancel out the auto italicization of these entries. Anyways :
Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- No I used the apostrophes to just cancel out the auto italicization of these entries. Anyways :
- They should never be in italics, they aren't newspaper/printed applications. Whoever told you to make them italics was wrong. — AARON • TALK
- It's Official Singles Chart, no 'The'
Done
- Status
On hold — AARON • TALK 20:39, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Passing. — AARON • TALK 12:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.