Talk:Dibrova, Sievierodonetsk Raion, Luhansk Oblast

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 May 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by Onel5969 (talk · contribs) on 6 May 2023.

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 16 April 2023 by reviewer Hoary (talk · contribs).

Ukraine

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notability

BoyTheKingCanDance, WP:GEOLAND tells us that "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low". I infer that this place is notable. (If I have overlooked some factor, please let me know.) -- Hoary (talk) 10:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my friend Hoary, I hope you're fine. I think I made my decision to add the template based on the word townlet, which sounds like a whistlestop and did not suggest to me a legally recognized place. But I'm very open to being wrong. If you say it's a legally recognized place, I'm happy to remove the tag. I'll do that now. Best regards, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 11:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BoyTheKingCanDance, to me "townlet" means no more or less than "little town"; but the population (even as presumably measured before the "separatists" or Russians had embarked on a full-scale war, and thus before recent depopulation) seems too low for any kind of "town". However, it's possible that Ukraine has a hierarchy that includes what are conventionally englished as "villages", "towns", and (between those two) "townlets". Perhaps Danielg532 will comment. ¶ Category:Villages in Sievierodonetsk Raion is a subcategory of Category:Villages in Luhansk Oblast, categorizing as the former makes categorizing under the latter superfluous; as both Category:Villages in Luhansk Oblast and (indirectly) Category:Villages in Sievierodonetsk Raion are subcategories of Category:Villages in Ukraine, categorizing as either the first or the second makes categorizing under the third superfluous. (See Wikipedia:Categorization#Diffusing large categories.) Or am I overlooking something here? -- Hoary (talk) 23:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are correct (My apology) :) Thank you revert the change and fixing the article! Danielg532 (talk) 23:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging others in conversation, Danielg532, Hoary, and BoyTheKingCanDance. The issue with this article, and several others by this same editor, is that there is nothing to say that this is a "Populated, legally recognized place". Normally, census data would suffice for this. In this article, there are 5 references, the first is simple mention, 2 of the others, CBC and The Guardian, do not mention the locale, the Critical Threats ref is a dead link, and the final one is a non-reliable source.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reasonable points, onel5969. I retract my "inference" above. -- Hoary (talk) 21:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
These are the ones which look simple, but when you delve into them, they are not so easy. I can't speak for every NPPer, but most of us, our inclination is to mark them "reviewed" and move on. But if they can't be verified, they shouldn't remain, imho. A couple of months ago, there were over a thousand 1-2 line stubs made about supposedly populated places in Uzbekistan. For the most part, they all used the same one or two sources, neither of which were valid. It was a bear going through all of them (for which I was roundly chastised by several admins for doing initially). Regardless, thank you for the response. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:03, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]