Talk:Dibbler

Mammals: Monotremes and Marsupials Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Monotremes and Marsupials (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Western Australia / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Dibbler is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

accident

I accidentally deleted this page. Sorry. I will fix it. Sorry. Please do not report me. Sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Pharmacist (talk • contribs) 07:04, 16 October 2006

Lol, it is fine. I have fixed everything you did (left some comments on your talk page). We understand mistakes here, no need to worry. --liquidGhoul 07:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redundance?

This page seems to focus primarily on the Southern Dibbler, which has its own page. It also needs to be organised, and it might be easier to delete or make a disambiguation page, as all of the information found here could easily be placed on the species pages. What do others think? Frickeg 01:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambig?

This article appears to be about two species of marsupial, in different genera no less, that share a common name. I think it should be a disambiguation page. Hesperian 12:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nah. There are other biology articles like this one that span genera. Jackal comes to mind. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Except i'm wrong and all jackals are in Canis. Still, I'm confident there are others like this one. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kangaroo paw spans multiple genera... but I'd like to see that become a disambig too. Hesperian 01:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please change wrong nomenclature - the southern dibbler is actually the dibbler.

Moved from talk:Southern Dibbler

I have previously posted Dibbler information stating this is incorrect nomenclature (see historical data where you can see several published research papers from Australia) and was given the same answer (i.e. "we use Mammal Species of the World and therefore our information is correct").

Its very shortsighted that Wiki uses an American published book to name mammals around the world, however I am telling you categorically that your information is wrong. Please do not be ignorant and claim that because you find it in a book it is correct. We all know that many books contain errors. It is time to fix this error and diseminate correct rather than false information.

I deal directly with the Western Australia scientists who are in the field as well as the Dibbler Recovery Team. I recently discussed this with Dr Tony Friend who is in charge of the Dibbler Recovery Plan, and he agreed with me. I can assure you categorically that no one calls them southern dibblers.

And further to your reference on the so called august Mammal Species of the World I strongly suggest you look at the latest version where the American publishers have corrected their mistake and now call this animal by the name that the scientists and academics in Western Australia all call it - "The Dibbler". Mick wackers (talk) 08:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note on move

I moved and merged the content from the article Southern Dibbler, I was swayed by the reference and changes to that article. The name is traditional, at least in one region, and conforms with a trend to restore these names to indigenous mammals. Best of all, the assertion and rationale are made in a reliable source. cygnis insignis 20:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well done cygnis insignis! Nicely edited too - I like it. Finally some one with some sense appears on the scene. It has amazed me that Wiki insisted on imparting incorrect information simply because it is in a book (called an august publication by one fellow who clearly must belong to the flat earth society) - rather than looking further and finding the truth...

Although I'm wondering about your name and whether you are a) from WA b) a supporter of that awful eastern coast team "The Swans"? Mick wackers (talk) 01:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dibbler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080815040733/http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/recovery/p-apicalis/pubs/p-apicalis.pdf to http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/recovery/p-apicalis/pubs/p-apicalis.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]