Talk:Diane Hathaway

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

United States courts and judges

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Diane Hathaway be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Ratings Counter Reset?Learner001 (talk) 21:13, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

I have no real knowledge of the deeper workings of the feedback tool, but there were ratings for the page, and now they are gone. Does anyone know how to correct or recover the lost page ratings? Thx

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Diane Hathaway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article (technically speaking) not notable

Learner001, this article should be tagged as not notable, because content can be integrated in the Michigan Supreme Court article, and a separate article is therefore not warranted per WP:CRIME. I therefore propose re-adding the notability tag. Please note that notability has a different meaning than usual in this policy.--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 19:48, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How would this content be integrated into Michigan Supreme Court? -Jason A. Quest (talk) 23:24, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JasonAQuest, how about a subsection in the Michigan Supreme Court article?--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 07:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thus making her the only justice to have her own section? If only a fraction of this article was included, it would still be WP:UNDUE. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 11:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about Diane Hathaway, not the Court. It is a biographical entry. She's not only a convicted felon, but, more importantly, a former justice of a State Supreme Court. There are certainly far less notable biographies on WP, so I'm not sure why there is any interest in suppressing this straightforward article. Hoping nothing is done without consensus. Learner001 (talk) 15:57, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Diane Hathaway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Short Sale link

There is a link, at the end of the first paragraph of the Mortgage fraud section, to the "Short Sale" article, which does not exist on English Wikipedia. There is, however, a Short Sale article on Simple English Wikipedia. Can it link there instead, at least, for now? Hamstergirl591 (talk) 03:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]