This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
The entire article was written using the chesno.org website dozens of times, on which her picture in blood and the words "Member of the Register of Traitors" stand.[1] I think it is unacceptable. Mhorg (talk) 21:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a controversial website, of course, but as long as the information is true... For me, it's not mentioning its polemical positions in the introduction (to which she owes her notability) which is non-neutral. DarkVador79-UA (talk) 16:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think we cannot accept a source that talks about a woman threatening her by inserting her image in a lake of blood, even if it is telling the truth. Mhorg (talk) 17:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
