Talk:Diamond DA42 Twin Star
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Diamond DA42 Twin Star article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Other aircraft of similar role, etc
[edit]Is there a reason the Aeronautics Defense Dominator is included? Its page says it is a UAV. MyIP19216811 (talk) 11:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- The page also says that the Aeronautics Defense Dominator is based on the Diamond DA42 Twin Star. And that it is used for similar roles/operations (aerial surveillance / survey / ISR). Personally I don't see an issue with its inclusion in that list... Guliolopez (talk) 12:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't realize the drone was an unmanned DA42. MyIP19216811 (talk) 01:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class aviation articles
- B-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- B-Class Austria articles
- Low-importance Austria articles
- All WikiProject Austria pages
- B-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English