Talk:Deterministic context-free grammar
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reworking the page
[edit]I'm considering fleshing out this stub. I'm planning on adding a formal definition, more background, and a few more examples. Also, the history and current use of deterministic context-free grammars would be nice. Any comments or ideas? Stratsve (talk) 05:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Yes, also these are exactly the well known LR grammars. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.124.33.244 (talk) 13:50, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't mind seeing an example of a grammar that is context-free but not deterministic-context-free. --Doradus (talk) 14:17, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
This article has serious correctness issues
[edit]See recent discussion [1] at the CS stack exchange.
PhS (talk) 13:31, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Deterministic context-free grammar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120405124425/http://computer-refuge.org/bitsavers/pdf/mit/lcs/tr/MIT-LCS-TR-065.pdf to http://computer-refuge.org/bitsavers/pdf/mit/lcs/tr/MIT-LCS-TR-065.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)