Talk:Desorption electrospray ionization

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Desorption electrospray ionization article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mass spectrometry (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mass spectrometry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Mass spectrometryWikipedia:WikiProject Mass spectrometryTemplate:WikiProject Mass spectrometryMass spectrometry articles

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ppiers2. Peer reviewers: NicoliTesta.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Related techniques

"related techniques" seems out of place. Wouldn't it be better to just link to "ambient ionization"? 130.64.102.200 (talk) 20:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I cut the related techniques section and linked to ambient ionization which contains that information. --Kkmurray (talk) 23:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

The general structure looks fine with the exception of the empty ion trap header and some issues with pictures overlapping borders. For accessibility the first sentence needs to be a better definition of the topic and perhaps reference DART a little less. Someone unfamiliar with DART isn't going to understand the comparison. For grammar and style the "history" section re-states what the introduction says, I would consider adding more context or revising the introduction so the reader doesn't feel like they read the same thing twice. I hope this is helpful. NicoliTesta (talk) 21:03, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

While the structure and content has improved since the last review, there are still some grammatical errors that could use fixing throughout the article. The introductory paragraph, while informative, could likely be written more clearly. NicoliTesta (talk) 19:18, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Desorption electrospray ionization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081026080055/http://aston.chem.purdue.edu/research/ionization/desorption-electrospray-ionization-desi to http://aston.chem.purdue.edu/research/ionization/desorption-electrospray-ionization-desi

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]