Talk:Design Council

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Industrial design Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apologies

Hi,

I work for the Design Council (www.designcouncil.org.uk) and this page does not reflect the last fifteen years of work we have been doing in the UK. We're aware that simply editing the page ourselves is frowned upon, but we want to make sure that the information on Wikipedia is correct and up to date. To that end, we want to replace the content of the page with the content from this page. We don't believe that the page from our site would need much in the way of a re-write (to make sure that it doesn't come across as a marketing piece), as the content on our page is factually correct - but any advice would be appreciated.

Many thanks,

Scorchio75 (talk) 11:35, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There've been a number of changes to the article over the last 3 years. But what we really need are more secondary sources: newspaper reports, design magazine articles, etc. etc. Please list any here. Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 14:26, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is certainly a very poor page for such a prominent organisation. Hell, even the picture of your offices is wrong. I work in the same building and that picture isn't it. Will see if I can rectify that. --gilgongo (talk) 19:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]