Talk:Desert Strike/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   See note

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Passing GAN. There's one minor thing though...in the reception section, you repeat several times "The magazine" at the start of a sentence. It's not a major thing that'd break the article for me, but it does honestly come across a little repetitive, and tweaking every other sentence with this like possibly combining it into the previous one were doable would help make the prose smoother.

I have no qualms beyond that, this was informative and a pleasure to read.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 10:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)